David Lewin

By

David Lewin

David Lewin

On Generalized Intervals and Transformations

Transformational Theory

Generalized Interval System

Maximally Even Sets


AI on David Lewin

David Lewin revolutionized music theory by treating musical intervals and relationships as operations within abstract algebra, specifically utilizing group theory. Rather than viewing a musical piece as a static collection of notes or chords, Lewin used mathematics to focus on the dynamic movements and transformations between those musical objects. His seminal 1987 book, [Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations (GMIT)](0.5.4, 0.5.10), forms the bedrock of modern mathematical music theory. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
1. Transformational Theory
Traditionally, music theorists focused on classifying objects (e.g., identifying a "C major triad" or a "G major triad"). Lewin shifted the perspective entirely to transformations. [1]
  • Instead of focusing on the chords themselves, he formalized the action that changes one chord into another.
  • For example, the transformation from C major to G major can be modeled as a "Dominant operation" acting upon the first chord.
  • This math-driven approach allowed theorists to analyze complex 20th-century atonal and serial music, which lacked traditional tonal keys, by mapping out recurring structural transformations. [1, 2]
2. Generalized Interval Systems (GIS)
Lewin generalized the concept of a musical "interval" far beyond simple acoustic distances between pitches. He defined a Generalized Interval System as an ordered triple \((S, IVLS, int)\): [1, 2]
  • \(S\) (Space): A set of any musical elements, such as pitches, rhythms, timbres, or chord structures.
  • \(IVLS\) (Interval Group): A mathematical group of transformations.
  • \(int\) (Interval Function): A function that maps a pair of musical objects from \(S\) to a unique interval in \(IVLS\). [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Mathematically, a GIS functions exactly like what algebraists call a principal homogeneous space or a G-torsor. By forcing intervals to behave like elements of a mathematical group, Lewin guaranteed that they have an identity element (the "null" interval) and inverse elements (a way to "undo" an interval). [1, 2]
3. Simply Transitive Group Actions
Lewin modeled musical motion using group actions. Specifically, he utilized simply transitive group actions, meaning that for any two musical objects in a system, there is exactly one specific mathematical transformation that connects the first to the second. This mathematical constraint ensures that analytical relationships remain structurally rigorous and completely unambiguous. [1, 2]
4. Pioneering Neo-Riemannian Theory
Lewin’s algebraic modeling revived and formalized the 19th-century theories of Hugo Riemann. He mapped out triadic transformations on a geometric network using specific algebraic operations: [1, 2]
  • P (Parallel): Transforms a major triad to its parallel minor (e.g., C major \(\leftrightarrow \) C minor).
  • R (Relative): Transforms a triad to its relative major/minor (e.g., C major \(\leftrightarrow \) A minor).
  • L (Leittonwechsel / Leading-tone exchange): Shifts the root of a major chord down a half-step to create a minor chord (e.g., C major \(\leftrightarrow \) E minor). [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Because these operations form a group, analysts can track how a composer navigates through a complex web of harmonies by combining these algebraic steps.
5. Advanced Mathematical Tools
Beyond group theory, Lewin introduced other sophisticated areas of mathematics to the discipline: [1]
  • Discrete Fourier Transforms (DFT): Lewin was one of the first to apply the Discrete Fourier Transform to pitch-class sets. He used it to analyze the "intervallic vectors" and differences between chords, laying groundwork for the study of maximally even sets (like why the major scale is spaced the way it is).
  • Combinatorics and Topology: He used early computational logic to formalize rules of species counterpoint and explored concepts rooted in algebraic topology and projective geometry to examine pitch spaces. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
If you would like to explore this further, let me know if you want to look at a concrete example of how a chord transformation works mathematically, or see how his theories apply to a specific composer like Arnold Schoenberg or Igor Stravinsky.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Computing and the Linguistic Turn

By
Image
Enigma (Wikipedia) Symbolic analysis and statistical analysis were both approaches codebreakers took in breaking Enigma. The development of AI has also incorporated both approaches. One historical question for AI is why the dominance of Symbolic AI, associated here with the linguistic turn, from 1950 to 1990? Note the development of AI out of the Dartmouth Workshop and especially the contributions of one of its attendees,  Ray Solomonoff , to the statistical approach, an approach taken up by Marcus Hutter , a DeepMind  researcher, and of course, others. Note that a history of AI outside the linguistic turn from Moritz Hardt and Ben Recht is in Patterns, Predictions, and Actions . And note too that along with the difference between the symbolic and the statistical is the difference between language learning and computer vision, which tends to be a history outside the linguistic turn. And the turn Richard Sutton takes is to push learning outside the context of language, which ...
Read more

A Heidegger - Bayes Hybrid Model

By
Image
A Conjecture for a Hybrid Model Bayesian epistemology concerns modelling and specifically, belief, but a Bayesian belief does not need to be fully formed to emerge alongside the Heideggerian to-hand. The Heideggerian to-hand thereby becomes the interaction that generates this further, which is, with this interaction, a certain realization of being in the world. Bayesian selection now concerns available beliefs as well as any to-hand [belief(s)]. How Heidegger Can Make You a Better Guitarist Bayesian Philosophy Bayesian Philosophy Bayesian Epistemology Bayesian Epistemology Bayesian Modelling Bayesian Modelling Bayesian Model Selection David Deutsch on Bayesian Epistemology Bayesian Philosophy of Science Bayesian Philosophy of Science A Bayesian Approach to the Philosophy of Science On Sean Carroll on an Application of Bayes The Heideggerian To-Hand On Heidegger On Heidegger Flipping Descartes Ready-to-Hand and Present-at-Hand Presence-at-Hand Ready-to-Hand and Unready-to-Hand Does Hei...
Read more

A Question Regarding Number as the Assumed Basis of Mathematics

By
Conjecture: The historical analysis of the development of mathematics tends to lean on artifacts such as tally sticks and etch marks. Here, commerce serves as the basis of mathematics, and thereby, mathematics is grounded in the ability to count, which is implicitly understood to be the basis of commerce (fair exchange).  Development of Mathematics Question: What if distance becomes the basis of mathematics? How does this concept ground mathematics? Rather than assert that mathematics starts with counting, we assert instead that mathematics begins with the realization of distance? Do we then realize that number becomes a shorthand for distance in the abstract? Number Number ... Distance
Read more