Survey of Current Philosophy

Current-Day

Reddit Listing of Current-Day Philosophers

Philosophy Emergent

European Philosophy Emergent

The New

The New and the Previously New

Whence Philosophy


Current-Day Philosophers

...

Brandom

Andy Clark

Zizek

...

Current-Day

Themes for Current-Day Philosophy


Current-Day Philosophical Themes

~

Questions Concerning Consciousness

~

Criticism of Technology, Technocriticism, Neo-Luddism, ... 

~

EcocentrismEcocentrism

Deep Ecology 

Rewilding, Ecological Restoration, Biodiversity, ...

~

Genuine Pretending

~

Immunological Turn

~

Transhumanism

~

Meaning Crisis, Timeline for The Meaning Crisis by John Vervaeke, ...

The Evolution of Meaning ...


~

On Genuine Pretending

Hans-Georg Moeller, a Philosopher of Genuine Pretending (Interview)

Moeller on Proflicity


Moeller on Daoism


Moeller on Genuine Pretending


.

On Technology

Critique


On Deep Ecology

Deep Ecology (Arguments for Signaling We Usually Ignore ... )

While Deep Ecology (earth.org) itself is often associated with radical theory and/or with radical politics,  Deep Ecology, the Substack publication, generally concerns brilliant observations loosely coupled with conjectures concerning our inter-relatedness as/with beings in nature. 

Indeed, the overarching theme for Deep Ecology (Wikipedia) is environmentalism or environmental philosophy.

Deep Ecology holds a general thesis that we are evolutionary beings, and as such, we may have abilities that beings in our evolutionary path also have. We have, in other words, shared capacity with nature. And we have, so the argument goes, not so much lost this capacity as suppressed/ignored/forgotten it. The imperative: We need to look to nature to find this capacity again. Hence, the brilliant observations.

How well this thesis works is one matter, but the purpose of citing Deep Ecology is not to criticize its argument so much as exploit a few aspects of it.

The argument Deep Ecology makes in this post (Feeling It) posits a conception of feeling as pre-linguistic. It also asserts how we are trained, so to speak, to ignore feelings that so arise, feelings that arise without the supplement of a near immediate interpretation, an interpretation which requires language. 

More so, we are also wont to avoid unfounded conjecture. Indeed, as presented in this post (Feeling It), we might be inclined to link an ill feeling in the morning, a premonition, to a friend found injured in the afternoon, but we force ourselves to forgo this unwarranted reasoning.

 And, of course, being so trained, we do not ask ourselves why such a feeling might have come to be at all. We ignore it as superstition/coincidence.  Deep Ecology, meanwhile, conjectures that such feeling might be a hidden capacity.

And otherwise being mindful of the beauty of the poetics, we take this argument to imply that thought happens without language.

Related: Hyper Normal Stimuli

Related: Genetic Learning

Related: Phylogeny Manifold

Related: Ecological Neuroscience


Philosophical Themes Re-Visited

On the Influence of Logical Positivism


A Review of Philosophy

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy


Modern Philosophy

Modern Philosophy


Contemporary Philosophy


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What Counts

Math Self-Study

Computing and the Linguistic Turn